The
Union Home Ministry on May 3, 2020 pulled up the states and told them that the
relaxation was not meant for the workers, who are intended to visit home,
instead it is applied for those who were in distress because they had been caught
in the lockdown unknowingly.
Soon after getting directives, the state
governments had rushed to book buses and trains to send migrant workers home.
Home Secretary, Ajay Bhalla’s mild rebuke
for the states on Sunday came after state governments rushed to the railways
ministry to run special trains to send all migrant workers home. Bhalla
underlined that the Centre had only made an exception for people who had been
stranded due to the lockdown.
“The facilitation envisaged in the
aforesaid orders is meant for such distressed persons, but does not extend to
those categories of persons, who are otherwise residing normally at places,
other than the native places for purposes of work, etc., and who wish to visit
their native places in normal course,” his letter to the state chief
secretaries said.
This is the first time that the Home
Ministry has explicitly, in writing, stressed that the operative word in its
order allowing migrants, tourists, students and others was “stranded”.
Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba had, for
instance, spelt out in his video conference with the chief secretaries last
week that the relaxation shouldn’t result in a free-for-all and states should
only allow people who were stranded due to the lockdown to travel from one
state to another.
On April 30, it was reported the fine
print in the home ministry’s order, ‘In Centre’s 2-page order on letting
migrants travel, there is 1 operative word’.
The Centre decided to send the
‘clarification’ in writing on Sunday after an assessment that states, under
pressure from the public and opposition, were getting into a race to send, or
bring home, as many migrant workers as possible.
Ajay Bhalia’s letter reads, “It is
clarified that the MHA orders are meant to facilitate movement of such stranded
persons, who had moved from their native places/workplaces, just before the
lockdown period, but could not return to their native places/workplaces on
account of restrictions placed on movement of persons and vehicles as part of
lockdown measures”.
The Union Government officials said the
state governments should have, in the first instance, offered the ride home to
14-lakh people living in relief camps run by the state or non-profit
sector.